University of Minnesota

Carlson School of Management

Management of Innovation & Change

Mgmt 6050, Fall Semester 2005, Term B, MW 9:55- 11:35 a.m., 2 credits

Prof. Andrew Van de Ven - Instructor

3-402 CSOM Bldg., Phone: 612-624-1864, Web page, OH: M 1:30-3:00 pm

John Bechara, TA, 3-353A CSOM bldg, Phone: 612-625-7575, OH: MW 11:40-12:40

Syllabus

ClassNet

Electronic Reserve

CourseLib



 

 

 

 

 

SESSION

OUTLINE OF CLASS TOPICS, READINGS, AND ASSIGNMENTS

Wednesday

Oct. 26

Topics: 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment:

Course Introduction and Overview    (back to top

 

What is innovation? What is change? How do they occur?

Course organization and procedures. 

Student introductions, team formations, & topic selections

Introduction to CourseLib and Information Literacy by UofM Librarian, Mary Schoenborn

Class slides by Prof. Van de Ven

 

Read: Mgmt 6050 course syllabus.

Innovation Journey, Forward, Preface, Chp. 1 and pp. 215-222.
Review Mgmt 5050/6050 CourseLib

Van de Ven, “Note on Building an Argument

 

Monday

Oct. 31

Topics: 
 
 

 

Assignment:

2. Mapping the Innovation Journey  (back to top)

 

Team discussion questions about individually-selected innovation cases:

  1. Which of the common hurdles in the innovation journey are/were present in your case?
  2. How would/should you maneuver these hurdles? What models could you use?

Class slides by Prof. Van de Ven

 

Read: Innovation Journey, Chapter 2

Select your own innovation case and fill out this case form to examine your case in terms of the 12 common elements of the innovation journey that are discussed in chapter 2.

Bring your completed case form to class today for discussion.

 

Wednesday

Nov. 2

Topics:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment:

 

3. Models and Methods for Innovation and Change  (back to top

 

The need for alternative ways of thinking about innovation and change.
Four ways to explain change: life cycle, teleology, dialectics, & evolution.
Methods for analyzing cases or problems (See Diamond Model).
 
Discussion questions: Explain WHY your case unfolded as it did.
1.              What triggered the process?
2.              What guided the development period?
3.              Why did it end the way it did?
Class slides by Prof. Van de Ven
 
Read: Van de Ven, “Organization Change” in Encyclopedia

Review Van de Ven, “Note on Building an Argument

 
Recommended supplementary readings you can download from UofM Library Electronic Reserve:
1.                          Delbeq & Van de Ven, “The Program Planning Model.” 
2.                          Greiner, “Evolution and Revolution in Organizational Growth.” 
3.                          Miner, “Seeking Adaptive Advantage: Evolutionary Theory & Managerial Action.” 
 

Monday

Nov. 7

Topics:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment: 

4. New Company Startup (Qnetics) and  Joint Venture (TAP) Cases     (back to top

 

Student teams discuss case questions:

1.                    What problems did this case encounter in its development? 

2.                    Which of these problems are inherent to new company startups or joint venture case?

3.                    Propose and argue a better way to handle one these problems.

Presentations by Team 1 on Qnetics and Team 2 on TAP

Class Notes by Prof. Van de Ven

Notes on new business startups by Prof. Van de Ven

 

Read: either Qnetics case Chpt. 10, or TAP case Chp. 9 in Innovation Journey

Aldrich & Auster, “Even Dwarfs Started Small” on Electronic Reserve

See information about entrepreneurship on Mgmt 6050 CourseLib

 

Wednesday

Nov. 9 

Topics: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment:

5. Internal Corporate Innovation Case: Cochlear Implant    (back to top)  

Student Teams discuss case questions:

1.                    What problems did CIP encounter in its development?

2.                    Which of these problems are common to internal corporate innovation projects?

3.                    Propose and argue a better way to handle one these problems.

Presentations by Team 3 and Team 4

Class Slides by Prof. Van de Ven

Note on decision biases

 

Read: Cochlear Implant case in Innovation Journey, Chp. 8. 

Summaries of Chandy & Tellis’s studies of the incumbent's curse and cannibalizing your products.

Complete Online Leadership Survey by the end of today.

 

Monday

Nov. 14

Topics:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment:

6. Learning the Innovation Journey   (back to top   

 

Student teams discuss learning in CIP and Qnetics or TAP cases:

1.             What learning disabilities did the cases exhibit?

2.             Propose a practical way to minimize these learning disabilities.

3.             Present an argument for your proposal.

Presentations by Team 5 and Team 1

Class slides on learning by Prof. Van de Ven

 

Read Innovation Journey Chp. 3.

Garvin, “Building a Learning Organization,” from UofM Library Electronic Reserve

 

Not all people learn the same way.  To get an idea of your own learning style, please complete before class the web version of the Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire.

Assess your scores by reading the Learning Styles Descriptors.

For more information read R. Felder, “Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education” and Richard Felder’s home page

 

Wednesday

Nov.  16

Topics: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment:

7. Leading the Innovation Journey   (back to top 

 

Feedback and discussion of results of  Online Leadership Survey that you completed last week.

Student teams discuss leadership in CIP and Qnetics or TAP cases:

1.  What problems of leadership did the cases experience?

2.  Propose a practical way to increase effectiveness of leadership in each case.

3.  Present an argument for your proposal.

Presentations by Team 2 and Team 3

Class notes on leadership by Prof. Van de Ven

 

Read Innovation Journey Chp. 4.

Quinn & Foreman, “Becoming a Master Manager” Chp. 1. on E-reserves

 

Monday

Nov. 21

Topics 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment:

8. Managing External Relationships in the Innovation Journey  (back to top   

 

Teams examine how 3M CIP’s relationships developed with HEI, Hochmair, Nucleus and FDA. 

1.                    What more or less should 3M-CIP have done in managing each relationship?

2.                    How did these relationships affect the development of the industry infrastructure? 

3.                    Under what conditions and on what issues should 3M have "run in packs” and “not alone?" 

Presentations by Team 4 and Team 5

Class slides on 3M-CIP relations by Prof. Van de Ven

 

Read Innovation Journey Chp. 5.

Van de Ven and Ring, “Relying on Trust in Cooperative IORs

 

Case comparison report questions (due Nov. 23)

1.        How is your cases similar and different to Qnetics and CIP in terms of the common elements of the innovation journey, learning, leadership, and external relationships? 
(Present answer in a table, and discuss the most interesting comparisons in 2 pages or less.)

2.        Diagnose a key problem or issue that was common to the three cases.
(Make your diagnosis explicit by listing the data or symptoms, your analysis, and your inference of the problem in 2 pages or less.)

3.        Propose a recommendation for managing this problem.
(Support your recommendation with an argument by stating your claim, reasons, evidence, reservations, and qualifiers in 2 pages or less.)

Please attach this Midterm Report Evaluation Form as the cover page of your report.

Methods for analyzing cases or problems (See Diamond Model).

 

Example of  a good midterm report by Karen Buhr

 

Wednesday

Nov. 23 

Topics:

 

 

 

 

Assignment:

9. Building an Infrastructure for the Innovation Journey (back to top

 

Audio streaming of Thomas Friedman on the World is Flat from Minnesota Public Radio

Discussion questions:

1.        How does a ‘flat world’ influence the management of innovation?

2.        Design an innovation infrastructure for a ‘flat world.’

Class slides on Innovation Infrastructure by Prof. Van de Ven

 

Read Innovation Journey Chp. 6

Van de Ven, “The Context-Specific Nature of Competence

Submit Case comparison report in class today

 

Monday

Nov. 28

Topics

 

Assignment:

10. Adopting and Diffusing Organizational Innovation and Change (back to top

 

Guest innovation manager, Dr. Thomas J. Marr, MD, Associate Medical Director,

HealthPartners Health Plan, Specialty Care

 

Live case on innovation adoption/diffusion of patient treatment of low back pain

Teams discuss the following questions about the case with Dr. Thomas J. Marr, MD.

1.        Diagnose the problems of innovation adoption and diffusion in this case.

2.        Explore how these problems might be addressed f you followed the advice in the readings?

 

Class notes on innovation adoption & diffusion by Prof. Van de Ven

Slides on low back pain project by Dr. Marr

 

Read: This article on low back pain

Geller, Cockell, & Drab “Assessing Readiness for change” on E-reserves

Piderit, “Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence,” on E-reserves

Cialdini “Persuasion” on E-reserves

 

Teams prepare recommendations on case for Dr. Marr on Wednesday

 

Wednesday

Nov. 30 
Topics: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment:

11. Implementing Organizational Change